Editorial

Should We Take Down the Jefferson Statue in Paris?

The woke movement dividing Americans has now reached France. Minorities demand that their rights be recognized, that history be revised, and white imperialism condemned. Now we find Thomas Jefferson, American ambassador in Paris and later president, caught up in this turmoil: His statue was recently removed from the New York City Council Chamber. Should we also take down the one on the banks of the Seine?
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
© Antoine Moreau-Dusault

“Every man has two countries, his own and France.” This was the emphatic declaration of Thomas Jefferson, ambassador to France from 1785 to 1789. As president, he famously introduced the White House to Bordeaux wines, ice cream, and French fries. This hardly prevented him from criticizing the “dissolute morals” of the French; as ambassador, he had frequented only the court and libertine salons. During the same period, Lafayette consulted with him on the formulation of what would become the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which was largely inspired by the Declaration of Independence. It was fitting that Paris should honor this cultural go-between, which finally happened in 2006, with a bronze statue in the traditional style sponsored by the Florence Gould Foundation. Striking a classic pose, Jefferson looks to the horizon, a quill pen in his right hand and a plan of his Virginia residence in the other. One could not blame the casual sightseer for missing this monument tucked away along the Seine. I confess I have walked by it without noticing it or asking myself whom it represented.

The statue can be found close to the Musée d’Orsay, which specializes in 19th-century art – so no link with Jefferson. And the quay there is named after the writer Anatole France – again, no connection. The statue stands at the entrance to the Léopold Sédar Senghor footbridge crossing the Seine in front of the Tuileries Gardens. The Senegalese poet introduced the term négritude (which he intended in a positive sense) into the French language, while Jefferson owned more than 600 slaves. It seems in fact that the spot was chosen by the Florence Gould Foundation for its proximity to the Palace of the Legion of Honor, built by a German prince in the 1780s. Jefferson admired this palace, even using it as the model for his future residence at Monticello, in Virginia. Our research on the placement of the statue would have little point if Jefferson’name did not now provoke political controversy. Having begun twenty years ago in the New York mayor’s office, this scandal came to a head in October when the statue adorning the chamber of the municipal council was removed. A local majority had successfully campaigned to have it taken out of the building because the author of the Declaration of Independence was a slave owner.

Woke ideology is at work here, which is understandable. An African-American of today does not necessarily wish to deliberate under the eyes of an owner of slaves, among whom may have figured one of his or her ancestors. But should not this same woke elected official also consider the Declaration of Independence, which in the end prevailed over slavery? History becomes further complicated if we consider the origin of this statue: It is only a plaster copy of the original bronze, which stands in the Capitol rotunda in Washington. In the 1830s, the person who commissioned the plaster statue, a certain Uriah Levy, charged local visitors to see it and used the money to help the poor. To banish Jefferson from City Hall is also an insult to charity.

Furthermore, Levy had ordered the work at his own expense from famous French sculptor Pierre-Jean David d’Angers because Jefferson had given citizenship to the Jews, an unprecedented emancipation in Western civilization. This allowed Levy to become the first Jewish senior officer in the U.S. Navy. The scales of judgment become more and more loaded, and Jefferson’s character more complex.

How can decide? The simple solution is to strike a pose: I am woke, down with Jefferson the slave owner! Or, I am anti-woke: Long live Jefferson, who liberated America from British colonization and religious discriminations! In today’s world, it is not fashionable to adopt a moderate position. But can we not recall that we are all citizens of our own era? Today’s truth is yesterday’s prejudice. A solution, although one too facile to excite enthusiasm, would be to propose the addition of a historical note at the base of every controversial monument. We might begin with the Jefferson statue on the Quai Anatole France, and then move on to the plaque honoring Marshal Pétain in Lower Manhattan; the plaque commemorates the visit
to New York in 1931 of the conquering hero of Verdun and future Nazi collaborator. No one is indignant over this commemoration. Where are the woke when we need them?


Editorial published in the January 2022 issue of France-Amérique. Subscribe to the magazine.

couv-cover-france-amerique-magazine-decembre-december-2021-pop-up

The best of French culture

Published in a bilingual format, France-Amérique Magazine is intended for anyone interested in French culture and Franco-American friendship.

Already a subscriber? Sign in